See the real commercial result
Connect pricing, promotions, rebates, deductions, claims, accruals, invoices, and settlements to the underlying customer and product transactions.
Designed to coexist with established enterprise systems. Meridian focuses teams on the decisions and exceptions that decide margin, service, and control—without asking analytics platforms to reconstruct what operations never connected.
Meridian is not a replacement for Microsoft Fabric. It connects operational execution to trusted analytics so reporting starts from cleaner decisions and transactions.
Microsoft Fabric can unify and analyze enterprise data. Meridian complements that investment by connecting the operational decisions and transactions that create the data in the first place. Cleaner execution creates cleaner analytics, faster explanations, and greater confidence in the result.
QualificationIntegration patterns depend on the customer’s architecture and the production readiness of each connector. Capability availability follows the status labels used throughout this site.
The invoice price is rarely the final economic result. Meridian connects pricing, promotions, rebates, allowances, deductions, chargebacks, claims, accruals, and settlements to the order and fulfillment history that produced them.
Presented as Meridian’s unified operating model for commercial programs—not as an automatic replacement for every capability in adjacent trade-promotion products.
In food and beverage, a customer commitment is connected to inventory, shelf life, quality, production, transportation, commercial terms, and margin. Meridian keeps that chain visible instead of dividing it among unrelated applications and reports.
Industry pack status: core roadmap. Capabilities below describe the intended operating model; availability follows the status labels used across Meridian modules.
Start with one process. Connect operational execution to the systems you already run. Expand only where the business case is proven.
A common operational model across transactions, decisions, and exceptions. Select a domain to trace what it depends on upstream and what it commits to downstream—designed to coexist with established enterprise systems.
{{ activeDomain.desc }}
Three layers, one platform. Records, actions, and intelligence share the same data model, the same permissions, and the same audit trail—so expansion is configuration, not another implementation.
Eight capability families on one foundation. Every module carries an explicit capability status, because knowing what is live today matters more than a longer feature list.
Screens shown are from the reference tenant. Availability of individual modules varies by capability status above.
Everyone works from the same records and the same numbers. What changes is the decision each role has to make—and the actions the platform puts one click away.
Connect customers, suppliers, warehouses, carriers, banks, governments, and internal systems without losing control of the transaction.
Standards, protocols, and partner scenarios listed here are supported product-design targets. Live coverage today is limited to the interfaces marked Live.
Policies, approvals, forms, and rules are configuration objects with versions, tests, and release control. Follow a real change end to end.
Recommendations are produced inside the process, against records the user is already permitted to see, and carry the evidence and approval path required to act on them.
Security is architecture, not a feature list. Each control below is labelled with its real status so your security and audit teams can assess it honestly.
No certification badges are shown on this page. Where a control depends on an external audit or a jurisdictional authority, it is labelled as a certification roadmap item and tracked by the product team.
Industry packs are configuration—terminology, process templates, KPI packages, data-model extensions—applied to the same platform. They are delivered progressively, and each pack states its own readiness.
A comparison of operating models, not of vendors. Many established platforms deliver extraordinary depth; the difference is how much organisational effort it takes to change them.
Footnote: bars indicate the relative organisational effort each operating model typically demands and are illustrative, not measured. Product capabilities and availability vary by implementation stage. This comparison describes architectural approach and is not a benchmark of any named vendor's current product.
Coexist with one controlled process, consolidate where results justify it, then transform adjacent domains—without a forced big-bang replacement.
Every engagement includes a transparent business case comparing the proposed Meridian scope with the current cost of applications, interfaces, support, manual work, and operational risk. Any assumed system retirement or saving is identified separately so the customer can validate it.
Figures are quoted against your actual scope, entities, and volumes rather than published as a headline, so the number you receive is the number that holds. Capability availability follows the status model above.
Four steps before anything is bought. Each one produces something you keep—notes, an audit of your current stack, a timeline, and a proposal written against your own numbers.
Bring us one workflow, its systems, its handoffs, and its exceptions. We will map the current operating model and show where Meridian could simplify execution without presuming a full-platform replacement.
Designed to coexist with established enterprise systems. Expand only where the business case is proven.